When you go in for an X-Ray, you’re trained to be careful of the radiation. When you pop an aspirin, you hope it’ll make your headache go away.
But do you ever ask yourself, was this designed with my body in mind?
Since 1747, clinical research has played an indispensable role in improving quality of life for all of us. If you thought dealing with mercury in retrograde was bad, without clinical research, we’d still be up against diseases like scurvy, smallpox, and the Bubonic plague. There’d be no X-Rays to see spot broken bones or stethoscopes to listen to the thump-thump of your heartbeat or the rush of air inflating your lungs.
There’s a lot to celebrate when it comes to clinical research— it functions as the essential step in making sure that any
“drug, device, tool, diagnostic test, technique and technology” invented works effectively and safely on humans.
But what if we told you that for almost 90% of clinical research’s existence, 50% of the population has been absent?
Even worse, this absence came from an active exclusion of female bodies—because factors, like hormones, were considered confounding variables that would skew outcomes rather than inform them.
In the United States, women were not required to be included in clinical research until June 10th, 1993 when Congress passed the NIH Revitalization Act. This means that the majority of the pillars of modern medicine we praise and rely on were designed for mankind (literally), rather than humankind. It means that our gender health gap comes from negligence rather than complexity.
Most importantly, it means we have a lot of work ahead of us in ensuring that moving forward, clinical research takes into account all bodies (not just some).
This work starts with acknowledging where we’ve come from and deeply understanding the milestones in clinical research to this day.